What would you say to someone who walks up to you after reading this above and says "well I think that is just actually adding another layer to "kernel module management"?
I personally know about little to nothing with how the FreeBSD/GhostBSD way of managing kernel modules is currently performed.
Adding a few examples here of "the original way" of Kernel Module Managment
Adding a few examples here of "the Kernel Module Station" way of managment may be of great help.
vimanuelt This tool would provide an intuitive interface for enabling or disabling kernel modules, making system customization more accessible to both novice and advanced users.
This does sound very good, but how difficult to create and begin to implement?
vimanuelt This application could be integrated into GhostBSD’s existing toolset, further enhancing its appeal to a wide range of users.
This does sound interesting.
Would this then help with the configuration of external nvidia gpu modules?
