Re: Installation report (X11/ZFS problems inside)
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:40 am
It isn't resource hungry for me, and generally speaking provide better performance when compared to a journaled UFS.tankist02 wrote:For me ZFS is too much resource hungry and slow for a simple desktop system. Its killer features are more suited for servers, I think.
However, like I wrote in a different post, it didn't worked well for me too when using 512 bytes blocks, and that independently from the disk physical sector size.