Search found 988 matches
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 12:06 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
Can it be done in 30 days? The new repo ? probably yes, what I'm unsure about is listed below: - build time at 250 pkgs x hour, will require 40 hours to build 10.000 packages - additional 40 hours for i386 arch a) network manager is already in fbsd ports (thanks) b) the other softwares (update-stat...
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 11:54 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
Eric, I'm not interested about discussing past choices, there were of course good reasons why things went that way. What I'm interested now is about "to define" a path for the near future, possibly with some agreements, else also without agreements but however fully defined, so that we don...
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 11:09 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
Since we're of course not building the whole ports tree - how are we going to do this, anyways? Will we have both the FreeBSD repo and our own with the later having a higher priority so that by default packages come from there but people can install software that we don't provide, too? "My&quo...
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:32 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
Wasn't that just written from you ?The ISO are build on quarterly and not on Latest to clarify, every build should be same, but for the part that is build from ports which I always had disagree, but I have let convbsd do this part that is an other story.
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:30 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
I will not delay, I did that in 10.3 and it resulted to be released in same time of 11.0, wish does not make sense once I started from alpha I am not putting new feature or drastic change, I have made my choice, I also did not know if you was coming back. As you prefer, the final choice is yours. I...
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:54 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: GhostBSD release model after 11.0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1236
Re: GhostBSD release model after 11.0
For now, I would stick with one release only, please do not forget we are still very few, hopefully we will increase in the next future. I agree with kraileith about internal testing and therefore internal only pre-releases; but in my mind I had something like: - ghostbsd-test-repo -> developers/tes...
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:48 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
The ISO are build on quarterly and not on Latest to clarify, every build should be same, but for the part that is build from ports which I always had disagree, but I have let convbsd do this part that is an other story. I know that, and the fact is that without our own repo there was no other choic...
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:10 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
OK, seems we agree.
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:28 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
hello there! I'm reading about a few issues with Xserver, both here on GhostBSD and in FreeBSD forum. The recent update to Xorg 1.18.x has broken quite a few things, work is in progress, but right now it is not as stable as it used to be. Just as an example, in some case a workaround is to manually...
- Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:26 pm
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: X server issues and ports
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Re: X server issues and ports
I was hit too, only on a laptop with intel graphics. Use Synth of FreeBSD repo is irrelevant anyway, both will work or not, the problems are upstream.