Search found 312 matches

by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:21 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Git repo(s)
Replies: 8
Views: 2058

Re: Git repo(s)

ericbsd wrote:Nah no keys​ in a git repository I did not ask for that, and I do not agree to that.
Do you want me to remove your keys again?
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:59 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: kraileth company Partnership
Replies: 3
Views: 6227

Re: kraileth company Partnership

Eric: You can have a look here (using a translation tool) https://www.omc.net . I wanted to get the server running first, but if you want, I can provide the company description at a higher priority. I need to ask about Paypal. That's probably a convenient way of doing things, I'm not really familiar...
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:20 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Git repo(s)
Replies: 8
Views: 2058

Git repo(s)

We now have a working git server for testing purposes (do with it as you please but don't put anything important there as that jail will be destroyed and rebuilt later!). It's located in an automatically created (using SaltStack) jail on the virtual server that is meant to become the EU mirror in th...
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:54 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: SaltStack states
Replies: 25
Views: 5340

Re: SaltStack states

what system is that ? where is located that git repository ? on the EU mirror ? Yes - or rather: The soon-to-be EU mirror. Right now it's a test system that will have to be rebuilt for production in a clean way when everything is done. and yes, please, add me and ericbsd keys. ;) Ok, I'll do that s...
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:33 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: SaltStack states
Replies: 25
Views: 5340

Re: SaltStack states

Yay, the git server is ready now! Got the additional NAT rule working and wrote a couple more states to automatically import an admin public key for access of the git server. The admin can then add more keys for other users; this could be automated as well but that's probably overkill (how often wi...
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:10 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: building our repository (software selection)
Replies: 5
Views: 1691

Re: building our repository (software selection)

We could effectively drop all packages depending on old compilers and thus get rid of them: https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions should we ? I'd say: Let's drop them and wait until somebody complains. The pkg repo will be quite big anyways and it's certainly not a bad idea to do some house...
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:36 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: building our repository (software selection)
Replies: 5
Views: 1691

Re: building our repository (software selection)

I also agree that it doesn't make sense to provide each and every compiler version in binary form - and that chess database... Well, chances are that nobody is ever going to miss it. :mrgreen: About OpenOffice: This is actually a pretty sad thing. I really wish, Oracle had donated it to the Apache f...
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:27 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: kraileth company Partnership
Replies: 3
Views: 6227

Re: kraileth company Partnership

What I just thought of regarding the server: There's one thing that we didn't talk about, yet. What about the payments? The easiest thing would be that I officially rent the server on behalf of the GhostBSD project and the price could simply be subtracted from my salary. Then Eric could refund the m...
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:36 am
Forum: Feedback
Topic: Packages Requests for GhostBSD
Replies: 20
Views: 26072

Re: Packages Requests for GhostBSD

Hi: One question. Could it be possible to go on with the official FreeBSD repositories instead of GhostBSD's?. For example, if I want to upgrade to the next FreeBSD release and avoid depedency problems? Short answer: Yes, that's possible. Long answer: You might want to reconsider this. Technically ...
by kraileth
Tue Mar 21, 2017 3:08 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: SaltStack states
Replies: 25
Views: 5340

Re: SaltStack states

I'm somewhat confident about 1) and 2). For 3) NAT rules will have to be changed. Anybody with a bit of PF experience wants to lend a hand? :geek: I don't think you need to change the NAT rule, (which apply to outbound connections), all you need to do is to add a rule to open/pass-in inbound traffi...