I think many who had visited, here, contributed to GhostBSD. If my request is not a good suggestion, at this time, I rather that be stated. I did not imply that GhostBSD would somehow be handicapped without me. All projects and distros move forward, nevertheless. I mentioned that I thought I made so...

These are modern times, and I think this would be a welcome edition to the features of GhostBSD, sometime in the future.

Crappy? This response surprised me. I know I shot myself in the ankle with the request for OpenRC. I ought to have never mentioned OpenRC, because, now, my true request will be forever overlooked. I had just came from a few sites that raved about it. In the past, I believed I have suggested some of ...

In terms of reliability and data integrity, SSDs are difficult to trust. Their controllers leave much to be desired. They get slower over time. Even the manufacturers have, drastically, reduced support from 5 to 3 years and declining. If it is not an SLC SSD, to me, it is a waste of money. I rather ...

Runit, as a simple startupscript, is not out of keeping with the traditions of Unix. Runit is, also, the fastest. It is robust and avoids the instability and complexities of similar programs. Gentlemen, run it, please!

My mistake. I didn't mention the laptop with the network issues ... the Dell Latitude E6410. I should have known, because Dell was, predominantly, Unix hostile throughout my experience. Recently, I even watched a video of how Ubuntu froze on a modern Dell and required a reboot. This was a stock Ubun...

Thank You.

That was disappointing to hear. Is the reason is because it was compiled only on ZFS? UFS is more desktop practical.

Thank You, that was an interesting read, indeed. Following the footsteps of PC-BSD would be the wrong move. I, really, prefer Runit. I agree, stability is paramount.

Faster Boot times with one of this init scripts?